Mark B Lundeberg

Yeah that makes sense on how to do it. For handling upgrade-dependent tests I'm not sure exactly what to do. Perhaps this: - list 0: legacy/experimental tests to run on...

@bitjson @joshmg we might not take care of keeping UUIDs sane though ... is it possible that instead you guys can track by test content instead? Or even, make your...

Overall it looks like the code is doing the right things related to the new activated features, however I don't know javascript well so it's hard to say clearly. The...

FWIW if my math is right, the current test succeeds with 99.984% chance. https://gitlab.com/bitcoin-cash-node/bitcoin-cash-node/-/issues/208#note_457729449 Fixed seed sounds like a nice idea. An alternative idea: Increase the rounds so that each...

For that last graph, what did you use for LWMA window size? I think you need more than 144 to match the same 'averaging material' as SMA-144. A factor of...

>  > >  Neat! It seems quite clear that the steady miners aren't being punished nearly as much in LWMA. So: - LWMA-220 has about equal statistical power...

> I was remembering wrong. Std Dev in difficulty is the same when N is the same. Interesting, I hadn't actually done the math and was making an educated guess....

Oh OK, did the math now, it should be LWMA-N stddev: sqrt((4/3) / N) SMA-N stddev: sqrt(1 / N) So if I have it right now, it's only a sqrt(4/3)...

Haha, I am honored you say that. I thought it was just a funny toy algorithm but yeah it has some interesting properties.

Hmm, regarding the last graph, negative stolen seems fundamentally wrong to me ... by definition, a switch miner should only direct their hashrate at this chain when it is profitable,...