Marc van der Wal

Sure, I will. I was also unsure about where to add these new test cases. I’ve added them in `Zone` because that’s where the tests involving MX records are, but...

Okay, sticking with `Zone`, then.

> The proposals do not follow the specification [template](https://github.com/zonemaster/zonemaster/blob/develop/docs/internal-documentation/templates/specifications/tests/Template01.md). Could you rewrite them? You could also check the active PRs for specification updates, e.g. #1098 and #1032. Done.

I’ve addressed some of your remarks in this iteration, but I haven’t updated the other test cases or acted on the remaining remarks yet. Also, step 14 is probably wrong...

Overhauled Zone11. Rewrites of Zone12 and Zone13 will come later.

Yes, validating an SPF policy is indeed a chore (and a tool like Zonemaster cannot necessarily check everything). But I’m doing some research on the use of SPF in the...

I think I can simplify this test case quite a bit. People very rarely make mistakes in the SPF version number. Less than 0,1% of domains in the `.fr` zone,...

> If I understand it correctly, Zone11 will consider such TXT records as non-SPF records. It is hard to say how much errors to look for. There is always a...