liv
liv
Good question! Rustlings has been proven to be more useful for Rust learners with previous experience, yes. I agree that the wording in the Readme file is confusing, I'll open...
@paulwilljones that's the idea, yes
@drguildo `test4.rs` is after the macro exercises in the recommended order, so you should have absorbed the basics of macros at that point. Generally, since there were some added exercises...
@drguildo Was that while you were running `rustlings watch`? If so, can you file this as a separate issue? That's definitely not right.
I think this PR is very much necessary, alchemist and lsp/eglot don't really work well together, therefore disabling it with LSP is almost required for Elixir development with Doom at...
If anything, this would be a `rustc` issue, since that seems to be where that's coming from, correct? I'm not aware of an option to change `rustc`'s word wrap settings...
I believe both links redirect to the exact same thing, but it would be nice to have consistent.
@all-contributors please add @aaarkid for content
I maintain my stance that this would cause more confusion than it would help most people 🤷 `rustlings watch` already tells you the full path of the current exercise, there's...
I suppose I'm failing to see the use case here. Most people would use `rustlings watch` which _tells_ you the path of the current/next exercise. `rustlings verify` does the same...