Matti Kortelainen

Is the 116134.7 workflow still useful to be run in PR tests?

A difference in one specific histogram in 11634.7, `EgammaV/ConversionValidator/ConversionInfo/pConvVtxdRVsEta` has started to appear, e.g. in https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/pull/40997#issuecomment-1460743585

> > Is the 116134.7 workflow still useful to be run in PR tests? > > I'd support to remove this from the limited tests Should we consider again removing...

@smuzaffar Just to clarify, are the scram-side changes already in? I.e. this PR can safely be merged?

Comparisons show the usual * https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/issues/43293 * https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/issues/43790

+core

I think the first commit (22c387ff1fee5d0f26616c78799a488c42f9ca45) should be dropped from this PR as it is part of https://github.com/cms-sw/cmssw/pull/44408, after which this PR should not need `dqm` signature, after which it...

@cmsbuild, please test Just to refresh (even if there isn't much to test)

@Dr15Jones I suppose the "RFC" can be removed?

+core