Ben Abrams

I don't have enterprise to test with I'd accept a pull request for it though.

If there is need I can probably throw together a PR if someone can test it for me.

@tas50 certainly open to it but I would rather focus on things like having custom resources and other improvements but certainly support if you want do this sooner rather than...

I would think that we need to replicate this: https://github.com/sensu/sensu-chef/blob/v5.4.0/recipes/_linux.rb#L56-L64 to https://github.com/sensu/sensu-chef/blob/v5.4.0/recipes/_linux.rb#L83-L87 but I don't really have a lot of time to test various platforms and suspect this would break...

This link may not work in the future (as we have limited retention on free slack) but here is the discussion: https://sensucommunity.slack.com/archives/C68LV5M9U/p1535578029000100

Sorry what I needed was what version of the rabbitmq cookbook got pulled in, based on what I see (the version of rabbitmq itself) you are on at least `5.x`...

Can you confirm if you modified this attribute? https://github.com/rabbitmq/chef-cookbook/blob/v5.x/attributes/default.rb#L6 from what I can tell from the defaults this should not have happened via an apt upgrade unless that was changed....

I opened a PR on the upstream erlang cookbook which might help your scenerio: https://github.com/chef-cookbooks/erlang/pull/65

@SeanSith you could try pulling in erlang cookbook `7.0.0` I think that should work, if you have a server to test with you can remove your hold and see if...

@smcavallo hmm I have been consuming (and more recently maintaining) this cookbook for about 5 years and have never had a dependency conflict with it. I have used this cookbook...