maityyy

> and use a specific item list or item tag For example: ```java public interface CustomEnchantmentExtension { @Nullable default TagKey categoryItemTag() { return null; } } ``` ```java @Mixin(EnchantmentHelper.class) class...

Already implemented https://github.com/FabricMC/fabric/blob/efd7c830ae75ef1af97b3e94c33a02312663d0cb/fabric-entity-events-v1/src/main/java/net/fabricmc/fabric/api/entity/event/v1/ServerEntityWorldChangeEvents.java#L31

Is "Intrinsically enchanted items" really needed in FAPI?

Already implemented: https://github.com/FabricMC/fabric/blob/1.21.10/fabric-content-registries-v0/src/main/java/net/fabricmc/fabric/api/registry/StrippableBlockRegistry.java

We can also use Interface Injection and add our own version of `RecipeBuilder::save` that would use (somehow) the mod namespace (or just static util class)

Fixed in https://github.com/FabricMC/fabric/commit/a12c792275964b283b03b0a1282ac923496bf1e1

The current implementation allows you to overwrite vanilla recipes, which is a common request. With the removal of `FabricRecipeProvider::getRecipeIdentifier` this will no longer be possible

Fixed in https://github.com/FabricMC/fabric/commit/a12c792275964b283b03b0a1282ac923496bf1e1

You change the codec, okay, but what about networking?

I decided to recheck the code and everything seems fine, so I'm sorry. :D My concern was that network packets might ignore the item NBT. And btw, no, recipe network...