Midori Harris

Thanks, @Clare72 ... despite leaving me more confused than before! Looking in OLS and OntoBee, RO_0002490 seems to be a direct subclass of RO_0002487 'relation between physical entity and a...

> I wonder if 'existence overlaps' should be broadened to include the case where the entity starts before and finishes after the process I would certainly find that more intuitive...

> whether absent should in fact be absentAnatomicalStructure That does sound like it would help make the distinction from missingProcess clearer. Tangentially related question: how do you decide whether to...

re various comments on absentAnatomicalEntity vs. lacks-all-parts: Thanks for the explanations, suggestions, etc. In FYPO we've only used the lacks-all-parts version, so far without problems. I'm happy to carry on...

> * absentProcess (using `abolished/absent and inheres in biological process`) > > * absentProcessInALocation (using `abolished/absent and inheres in biological process part of anatomical entity`) > > ... > I...

Probably. FYPO already uses a lot of the GO chromatin region terms. Of the four logical defs using located_in, two can change to existing GO CC terms. I can request...

ticket opened; we'll see what they make of it

Also see https://github.com/geneontology/go-ontology/issues/19178 - GO may second-guess the newest of these terms. In the meantime, FYPO logical defs haven't changed.

Sorry, all I really remember is how confused I got when @CuzickA tried to explain the distinction between pathogenicity and virulence to me and Val. She and @jseager7 can help...

> Regarding increased "level" of process equivalents: rather than `extra processual parts`, which suggest to me that there is something qualitatively different going in the the process (something extra), perhaps...