Madelyn Olson

We weren't exactly sure if this was useful, so we decided to delay it for a future version.

This was one of the last items we discussed before the old redis team got disbanded. The core issue we saw is that this is a breaking change and we...

Since this is a breaking change, I think we will probably not move forward with this for now. @lipzhu Let me know if you feel otherwise.

Btw, my opinion isn't that strong. I don't really mind another mechanism, it just seems weird that we are doing something yet another way. > Where do we do this...

Discussed briefly in core team meeting. No more open questions, so once low level details are done we can merge it for 9.0.

Yeah, oranagra is right about the current limitations. We've talked about various approaches to make the impact on the source and target less impactful, but haven't made a lot of...

What did we decide to do about this?

The idea was that if there are a very small number of pending requests, then it will be faster to just process them all on the main thread and continue....

Consensus is that we don't want to rush the implementation and commit to a specific API, after we are technically past the new API cutoff for the release. If we...

Is your application bottlenecked on throughput? The use case generally makes sense to me, but I would rather avoiding adding a command if we can optimize the existing codepath. I...