madbkr

I like the second suggestion, I will implement that one.

On relations: @stap-m used "concretized" and "describes" in that scheme. Whle you already commented that you were unsure if these relations should be in the ontology, I found them rather...

According to the scheme I would add all the subtask of a task as a subclasses of `action specification`. So the classes: `data acquisition and pre-processing` `extrapolate wind speed vertically...

According to the scheme I would add tasks headline as a subclasses of `objective specification`. So the class: `determined wind characteristics of a region` I stuck to the preliminary definition:...

According to the scheme I would add a method with the task's headline as a subclasses of `methodology.` So the class: `determination method for wind characteristics of a region` with...

According to the scheme I would add `method realization potential` as a subclass of `realizable entity.` The preliminary definition is: `Method realization potential` _is a realizable entity that describes the...

According to the scheme I would add `determination process for wind characteristics of a region` as a subclass of `process`. The preliminary definitions is: `Determination process for wind characteristics of...

Lastly I would add `process endpoint` as a subclass of `process boundary` . Am am very surprised this was not already in there to be honest. A definition could be:...

@stap-m Now I see what you mean. As the imported definitions usually leave out the first part of the sentence (see pic) I assumed that it was implied. I will...

Alright, then I will remove the relations and all axioms that include them. Of course now some of the new classes don't have any relationship with each other now. I...