madbkr

If I understand it correctly, then `trades` and `is traded at` are currently inverse of each other and are between a product and a market exchange. What is missing is...

I have not found a lot in other ontologies. I don't think any of this will be the solution to this problem, a new relation seems more reasonable to me....

I took a look at these classes. If I am not doing this wrong - which is possible - then none of them have unique axioms associated with them except...

For the tasks module it may be interesting to add `operating cost` and` maintenance cost`. In my opinion those could both be children of `fixed cost`.

The removal of the `social cost of emission axioms` sounds reasonable to me. As for `system cost`: It is defined as `System cost `_are total costs of a system._ I...

I think that definition would definitely make it easier to see system cost as definitely related to a process.

This issue was marked as ready for implementation even though we only agreed on part of the discussion. this part is already implemented I think the discussion around `energy storage...

I don't think it should be possible for a model to have a` level of uncertainty `but no relation to `uncertainty`. I'd almost say that **every model** has to have...

> If we don't relate them in any way it would be pretty hard to distinguish between two different kinds of uncertainty. Because a model should be able to e.g....

`critical infrastructure` is currently defined as equivalent to: ``` 'object aggregate' and ('has part' some ('artificial object' and ('has role' some 'critical infrastructure role'))) and ('has part' some (system and...