Samuele Maci

you're right ... it could result in being quite heavier in checking only types! So let's get rid of that! I would still unify the conversion logic within ``HttpClient`` class,...

@greenphire-greg PRs are always welcome 😉 I'm still unsure about what should be the more appropriate return value in case of a response is not json or msg-pack.

As I'm no longer a Yelp employee and as I'm getting less exposure to the library usage I would defer the decision to @analogue (or someone currently within the Yelp...

If your endpoint should produce JSON output (produces in [SwaggerObject](http://swagger.io/specification/#swaggerObject) or in [OperationObject](http://swagger.io/specification/#operationObject)) and instead it produces HTML output the trouble is on the swagger specs and not on the...

@gstarnberger fair point ... During hackathon @sjaensch started to work a bit on async io bravado and we were discussing if it could make sense to move into bravado the...

@ASMfreaK Thanks for reporting the issue. Something that I would highlight is that the specifications in https://en.demo.grocy.info/api/openapi/specification are Open Api specifications, while bravado does support Swagger 2.0 . Checking the...

Hello @openfly and @bedge , it's not clear to me what exactly are you proposing to address. Could you detail a bit more? Knowing the use-case could simplify further discussions

Checking https://cloud.google.com/compute/docs/tutorials/python-guide looks like the GCP python client exposes Google Cloud Platform apis via methods and not Swagger specs, so it shouldn't be usable with bravado. @jakebiesinger: I'm probably misunderstanding...

Hello @Amedeo91 ... I don't understand what exactly is your issue. What do you mean with "I have to solve them manually" ? Having additional context / code example will...

@stepankuzmin : Is this PR something that can be interesting ? I'd really like to have a similar feature as while dealing with relatively small libraries, building grcov from scratch...