Jeremy Walker

As a dumb noobie to Passport (and not exactly a world-renowned expert on Express either) I would like to politely +1 the usefulness of more documentation. If you look at...

>however the master that I've been postponing releasing for a while (as it's a breaking change) doesn't Awesome, I will keep an eye out for it. >As for the license,...

>With BSD/MIT, in fact, I as a contributor would get screwed because my work can then be taken "offline", improved upon and the improvements never returned to the public. That's...

This? Must.js is released under a Lesser GNU Affero General Public License, which in summary means: You can use this program for no cost. You can use this program for...

>Oh, and did our conversation here address your concerns and remove them with regards to (L)AGPL? For the project I'm working on (a personal side project) the redistribution thing is...

Per https://github.com/blog/1964-open-source-license-usage-on-github-com the top three licenses are MIT (44.69%), GPL2 (12.96%), and Apache (11.9%), for a total of 68.84%. And that's across GitHub overall: based on what I've seen those...

> I've gone through and done some editorial for accuracy, clarity, flow, and factoring in feedback that I've received over the years. Looks great! >You're not wrong in what you...

I noticed this in the code: >"Computed column" functions should have been called "custom field" functions Why not just change the term for 5.0 then? You add one prominent line...

What is the use case for the Node version of `.only`? The use case in other major test frarmeworks is clear: I have 50 tests of one function, and I...

P.S. As far as performance, I'm curious how Mocha (see https://mochajs.org/#exclusive-tests), Jest (https://jestjs.io/docs/api#describeonlyname-fn), etc. all solved this same problem: surely Node's test runner that fundamentally different from all others?