Lyuba Zehl

@apdavison thanks for responding so quickly to this. I'm not sure I agree for the following reason: I could imaging using the same computational model to create multiple digital subjects/twins...

@tgbugs just to pin you on this issue for further discussions since you are facing the same issue

@elenimath we can use this issue for further discussion on service types. Feel free to pin who you think should be involved here.

@openMetadataInitiative/openminds-developers these annotations should be discussed. If we agree on them we can start triggering the respective updates in WebService and Software.

> On "type" OR "function" OR "functional capability": > > There is considerable overlap with [SoftwareFeature](https://openminds-documentation.readthedocs.io/en/latest/instance_libraries/terminologies/softwareFeature.html) and [SoftwareApplicationCategory](https://openminds-documentation.readthedocs.io/en/latest/instance_libraries/terminologies/softwareApplicationCategory.html) @apdavison I started revising them for discussion here: https://github.com/openMetadataInitiative/openMINDS_instances/issues/389

@openMetadataInitiative/openminds-developers this needs to be discussed for v5.0

@Raphael-Gazzotti ContributorType: fully correct, we may want to go deeper. I checked again and I would like to follow the logic of [DataCite](https://datacite-metadata-schema.readthedocs.io/en/4.6/appendices/appendix-1/contributorType/#contributortype) (so ContributorType), but then as you suggest...

Alternative approach for the upper part RP/RPV replace "author", "developer", "otherContribution" with "contribution" contribution (1-N) embedded type Contribution New Contribution: contributor (1-N) embedded type: Contributor (ordered list) role (1) linked...

Picking up the discussion again for this issue and pushing towards a final decision here. Summary of the options (focusing on the essentials): **OPTION A** ``` RP/RPV has contributor (1-N)...

I don't like option D because it defeats the purpose of merging all possible contributions roles into one property instead of listing them separately. If we separate again custodians from...