Lyuba Zehl
Lyuba Zehl
this will most likely go to the new deployment schema(s); should be decided with the overall service/software update.
@apdavison @olinux @Raphael-Gazzotti I wonder if we can close this issue now? I think we will cover this in the deployment schema(s) now and I wonder if we can handle...
follow up question: I assume that the software version or even software could be changed using the same scanner / device (I know that his would be also true for...
@jcolomb this is a good point. so far I would have categorized firmware as software to be honest (just not running on a users computer but directly as part of...
@openMetadataInitiative/openminds-developers I though about this a bit more and I'm not sure if it is worth introducing different categories of PIDs for the different research products. I would suggest we...
Should be maybe discussed together with revision of publication extension (moving digital ID schemas there, making publications an other essential submodule besides core and controlledTerms). Should also be discussed in...
Suggestion makes sense to me. But this is not really a bug. It will be a major change though since the update would not be backwards compatible. Should keep this...
This should be discussed for v5.0 but systematically for general new device categories.
TODO: clean up EBRAINS and remove service from controlledTerms
depends on / should be solved with the revision of services in general, cf.: #528 #527