Sergey Lyskov

@ThFe thank you for info! I agree that it would be preferable to be able generate bindings for everything that C++ technically supports. re 1, 2: this might work for...

> but if `Annotation::Base().eliminatable` is itself threadsafe this function should not need to be protected by the GIL -- @zwimer could you please elaborate on this? Particularly why should we...

Interesting idea @zwimer ! I think this should be possible to do on the class level or/and namespace level. Let me think about how is it best to handle this.

@Thermi looks like Binder was not able to find any object/namespaces to bind. Could you please try to replace `--bind mdbx ` with `--bind ""` and see if that make...

Also, i briefly looked at mdbx.h++ and looks like there is a lot of low level c-style functions, some of which might not be possible to bind. If above suggestion...

@simleo i see your point. If i remember correctly there was a technical reason that made placing namespace binding on top, - i will see if it possible refactor this.

> Maybe I've missed that, but is that possible to prevent creation of bindings for certain constructors? -- yes, this is already supported, one can use `-function my_namespace::MyClass::MyClass(...)` notation to...

I have not tried binding LLVM itself but it sounds like an interesting project! - on issue itself: it sounds like Binder is not processing `.inc` files, - is that...

@makslevental all-include.hpp should absolutely have include files _for all_ types that you planning to bind. Just includes with forward declarations will not do: - full declarations will be needed. Hope...

@makslevental I am not sure if fully understand you question but I guess we can say that this is limitation of whole technology in general: you see, - in order...