Andrew Scheller

> Maybe also consider RP2040/Pico with 200 MHz clock. Yeah, good point https://www.hackster.io/news/the-raspberry-pi-rp2040-gets-a-surprise-speed-boost-unlocks-an-official-200mhz-mode-d6c9d267de5a That would suggest a minimum PIO frequency of 3052 Hz, so perhaps it makes sense to update...

Copy'n'pasting a comment from the issue that I linked to earlier (which in hindsight I should have done earlier)... > For the benefit of anyone else reading this issue: the...

https://github.com/raspberrypi/pico-examples?tab=readme-ov-file#freertos is probably a good starting point. I've never tried building FreeRTOS myself yet, but I believe that if you clone https://github.com/FreeRTOS/FreeRTOS-Kernel/ and then initialise the submodules, that'll automatically download...

> > RP2040 has determined current consumptions of PIO blocks > > Where? Section 5.7.1. of https://datasheets.raspberrypi.com/rp2040/rp2040-datasheet.pdf The OP seems to be complaining that the corresponding section 14.9.7.1. in https://datasheets.raspberrypi.com/rp2350/rp2350-datasheet.pdf...

ping @dp111 and @mike-stimson

Sounds like this issue has been resolved, so closing.

I dunno if what you're asking for is possible, but could you also achieve the same effect by having a different number of NOPs at the start of each pioasm...

pinging @hathach to see if he has any suggestions from the TinyUSB side.

> both the 'if' statements are commented as '# core 0". See #105 :wink: > But the part that seems iffy is that the ap-num parameter is identical for both...

> By the way, with this change the chip runs at 50 MHz, not 150!! Is this a known issue? Should I report it? (how?) Best place would be https://github.com/raspberrypi/pico-feedback/issues