Luke Warlow

I wonder how intrusive it would be to make the WPT helpers trusted type compliant? The alternative is a custom harness for trusted type tests that does what it needs...

Yeah that's the trade off, benefit it's less intrusive to the rest of the suite, it wouldn't need to be the whole harness like just the helpers we use but...

Sorry for the slow response on this. I'm planning on addressing your comments this weekend thanks for the review!

I'm going to make a google doc for this and jot down general bullet points of things that might be worth mentioning. Writing isn't particularly my forte so bulleting stuff...

> I'm going to make a google doc for this and jot down general bullet points of things that might be worth mentioning. Writing isn't particularly my forte so bulleting...

Just a note of a thought for me to think about more later. Is it worth adding the gov.uk design system to the OpenUI catalog?

https://docs.google.com/document/d/13_Dxxszw2j8ELYUi2FAKPkeUZ1ddcKUnX_ZRGqPErXs/edit?usp=sharing here's a link to a google doc should provide edit access. Currently just got the above comment noted down.

Is it worth us getting this merged (happy to remove stuff like the anatomy and just have the research) and then do the extra stuff as a follow up?

I've stripped this back to just basic research with the explainer and proposed anatomy moving to https://github.com/openui/open-ui/pull/861 that way the final bit doesn't block the initial research landing.

@gregwhitworth are you able to approve this to land the research. Then I can resurrect the explainer?