Lukas Eder

Yes, in that direction, although, I wonder if we can create an intersection type `` (e.g. a Proxy) such that this `get()` method is not really needed...

Indeed, also, they are not "denotable" types, i.e. the caller couldn't assign `R` and keep both `T` and `Closeable` semantics (at least not before `var` is introduced in Java 10).

Thanks for your suggestion. We'll consider it, should we decide to implement #5.

@JingHuaMan Ask yourself: What benefits would such an implementation provide? What price would we have to pay for it?

Thank you very much for your suggestion. There's an existing `CheckedFunction.unchecked()` method that does something similar to what you suggest. However, it doesn't correlate the throw exception from `CheckedFunction` with...

Indeed, your suggestion is better. This will also include any future improvement that we add to `THROWABLE_TO_RUNTIME_EXCEPTION`

OK, I can see your point. Indeed, such a change does seem to suggest a much easier handling of wrapping such blocks. Now, there are only two problems left: 1....

Thank you very much for your suggestion. That is an interesting approach. Should we decide to provide utilities for the JDK's concurrency APIs (see also https://github.com/jOOQ/jOOL/issues/283), this multi-join-into-tuple approach definitely...

Thanks for pinging, @billoneil. I think this idea needs to ripe a bit, first. Improving this area seems to be scratching an itch that few people have, and at this...

Interested in contributing? :) `GROUPING SETS` are a very SQL OLAP operator. The following SQL Server documentation page explains nicely, how they work: https://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb522495(v=sql.105).aspx In other words, they're combining `GROUP...