Lukas Eder

> Sometimes convention is not perfect but is well-known, accepted and thus suitable for similar situations 1. Internally, there's already a `sneakyThrow` method, probably for the same reasons (found the...

@TheRealMarnes I respectfully disagree. Having funky names in an API is something a maintainer spends a lot of time discussing with many people. Surely, this particular case is trivial and...

Thanks a lot for your suggestion. I can see how this could help in your example, though it's not strictly necessary. You can always just `filter(t -> t.v2 > 17)`....

I had thought of it. A `Predicate` offers 2-valued booleans, a `Function

Well, we might get `Function

Thank you very much for your suggestion. The functionality seems to be covered by `Seq.grouped()`. The advantage of the `Seq.grouped()` API is that it produces lazy evaluations of group values....

> works on the current T only (uses Function) indeed, this could be improved with additional overloads > My real use case is much more complex than simple string concatenation,...

> Did you find the time to think about it? :) No, sorry > I'll understand if you want to wait until more people request this feature, though. Yes, definitely....

Hi Sudharma, That sounds quite interesting. Could you provide a pull request so I can have a look? Cheers Lukas

Yes, yes, sure!