Luca Ongaro

I am not sure about what you mean by element ordering, but I would totally consider pull requests implementing useful features. On Sep 2, 2014 12:13 PM, "Tino Brackebusch" [email protected]...

This is a really good idea. Alternatively, one could pass a html list with unique values, specifying the relative weight of each `` in a `data-weight` attribute. Or even omit...

This error seems to be a server-side one, as far as I can see not related to jQCloud. That said, if you set an option not in the list of...

In latest jQCloud, by default overflowing words are removed. You can turn this behavior off by setting removeOverflowing to false (see the README): ``` $(...).jQCloud([...], { removeOverflowing: false }) ```...

Hello, This would be an awesome addition to jQCloud. Unfortunately it is far from trivial to implement. One simple possibility would be to add an option for not drawing at...

That's actually a good option. I would definitely support this feature. On Monday, May 6, 2013, Drew Batshaw wrote: > I think having option to not draw words that would...

If not rendering the clouds in parallel is not an issue, an idea could be to concatenate clouds using a callback function. Something like this: ``` html ``` ``` javascript...

tttp, this is a great idea I tried to tackle some times ago. Unfortunately CSS3 transform isn't suitable for vertical words in the cloud, since even after the word is...

Ok, I merged it into master and released jQCloud version 0.2.3 :)

It certainly would be possible, but that would work only with rotations of 90 degrees, so the 'vertical words mode' would have to become an option to be passed to...