Lakshman Sankar

I assume the tool isnt' being maintained actively anymore? Similar to the original issue poster, I have a contract that rattle isn't working for, but if you guys aren't working...

cool, will do! thanks for the quick reply

Didn't seem to be any major dissent on the eth2.0 call so can draft a PR for the ttd override. Personally agreed also on the point that being able to...

> I don't see any reason for some majority to fork several chains as any difficulty increase in any fork will get the chain closer to transition total difficulty. Also...

Is the subnet check (potentially) expensive because of the need to check for active validators at the epoch? Otherwise it seems like O(1)

got it, this makes sense. putting the slot-range check first and keeping it there seems like a good idea in general; opens up other validations that we can add later...

Given that infura's only running teku for now, this would require running a lighthouse node and adapting service code to use lighthouse APIs, right?

gotcha. given that you're not pulling performance-oriented data from what i can tell, probably not particularly high priority to add more clients

+1 on designing withdrawal-credential changes as a one-time operation scoped only to those with `0x00` creds. There aren't obvious use cases for this beyond allowing staking pools that launched prior...