Lasse R.H. Nielsen

If we go fully hypothetical, then your hierarchy makes sense. I wouldn't call the top `Record`, maybe `Values` (plural). The question is what the *other* subtypes of `Record`/`Records` is, other...

It does indeed seem like that feature never made it into DartDoc. All the more reason to introduce the `library;` declaration.

@Silentdoer Not sure what point you are making. You can add names to libraries if you want to, and you can choose not to if you want to. The one...

Just do it! (My biggest obstacle to having already done this was that it required changes to the analyzer AST model. Parsing is trivial. Libraries having empty names is already...

So, basically, if you use an initializing formal for a privately named field as a named parameter, the name of the parameter, in the function type of the constructor, becomes...

The snippet works today, but the parameter name is the private identifier `_windows`. The name of positional parameters are not that important, but it does show up in the DartDoc,...

Yes, the *parameter name* and the *local variable name* of the variable induced by the parameter need not be the same. It's probably going to be confusing to some people...

While an exponentation operator can solve some issues, it won't make me get `0x7FFFFFFFFFFFFFFF` right. That is a valid 64-bit integer literal (at least if I counted the F's correctly)....

Honestly: Priority is low. It's not *blocking* anything. The "small" features which will be part of Dart 2.13 are things you simply couldn't do before, so adding them now enables...

(SDK library change proposals do indeed belong in the `sdk` repo. That said, we don't plan to change `int.parse` to handle any more extra features. It's fairly important that it's...