Luciano Resende
Luciano Resende
We must be compatible with the yarn version supported by JupyterLab, and ideally, use the jlpm bundled with JupyterLab to avoid incompatibilities...
Could we remove the tekton options and docs as well ?
@caponetto do you want to squash this with "co-authored tags" and sign the squashed commit so we get the DCO passing?
Capping the client to 1.28 would make it work for current users, but would make it fail for users that have upgraded to >= 1.29 then... Another approach would be...
@merqri how about we do something like: ``` +def get_subject_class(): + """ + Returns the appropriate Subject class based on the kubernetes client version. + + In kubernetes-client, V1Subject was...
See the following -> https://github.com/jupyter-server/enterprise_gateway/issues/907#issuecomment-737335153
I would provide a pull request so others could help.
Feel free to provide a Pull Request
@caponetto I tried to cherry-pick some of these with conflicts or other issues. Maybe it would be easier if you submitted a PR with some details on how to validate....
We should be ready for release after the rc5 released today.