Laurent Pugin

That makes perfect sense. Could you open an issue in the SMuFL repository about it https://github.com/w3c/smufl. You will have a much better wording and set of examples to provide. I...

Verovio is too nice ;-) `@staff="1"` with `@place="between"` is actually not valid MEI. We could add a warning somewhere. I see you point regarding the need to change continuously between...

Wouldn't it be better to do the alignment correction within a separate functor call dedicated to it? When looking at it I thought this should be done right after the...

I am pretty convinced that doing the adjustment right after AlignHorizontally would work. The displacement we need to apply does not have not much to do with the bounding boxes,...

OK, now I see, and it makes sense. Maybe we can do both? First make an alignment correction (after AlignHorizontally), and then add the exception you added in `AdjustXPos` for...

I updated the `artic-001` in the [test-suite](https://www.verovio.org/test-suite.xhtml?cat=artic) and included `acc-soft`

One point regarding the textual versions. I wonder if it would make sense to allow `` to contain textual content. Then we could have things like `(laissez vibrer)` for cases...

> There's no need for a `@form` attribute. An `` will either have associated text (a ``) or it won't. It may seem counterintutitive, but for a text-only laissez-vibrer, there...

Allowing textual content within `` seems to be a reasonable first step (moving to MEI 5.0). More complex cases such the last one brought by @rettinghaus would still need to...

> Textual content directly, or ``? Textual content directly. Starting to have control events within control events will cause all sorts of problems. Most of the text rendering control happens...