Louis Pilfold
Louis Pilfold
Let's use the name "update" after this has been actioned: https://github.com/gleam-lang/stdlib/issues/570
Closing this to track in the other issue. Thanks folks!
Oh that's clever. We could use that syntax for any invisible grapheme- is that what you're saying? How would we identify which ones are invisible?
Let's change it to this: ```gleam float.negate(0.0) |> float.negate |> should.equal(0.0) ```
Looks like you have a failing test when running on the JavaScript target
Sorry, you'll need to rebase on main to have the tests run due to the merge conflict
Hmm I'm not sure why rebasing the branch to remove the merge commit closed the PR. Perhaps something to do with it being called `main`? I think I made a...
Thank you