Victor

@QuantApp is there anything asynchronous at all happening in your app?

@dblohm7 the McpManagementService appears to be ignored > Get-Service | Where-Object {$_.ServiceName -eq "NetSetupSvc" -or $_.DependentServices.Where({$_.ServiceName -eq "NetSetupSvc"})} | Select-Object -Property ServiceName, StartType, Status > Get-Service: Service 'McpManagementService (McpManagementService)' cannot...

Just wanted to bring this up, as shapes and extensions have nothing to do with this feature request, as it talks neither about extending an existing type (extensions), nor about...

@gafter for the explicit type argument would it be possible to simply allow invoking the method via `ClassName.op_Addition(..., ...)`?

@gafter I don't understand your example. Can you explain what would be broken? Here I am declaring `op_Addition` in `B` the same way I would declare `operator+`, and the emitted...

Oh, you are actually referring to this case: https://sharplab.io/#v2:C4LglgNgNAJiDUAfAAgJgAQEECwAoA3nusesgMykCMAbFugPYAOA+pjDGMGPQHYAUmdAENKUOkNQBKdAF4AfMMoBuPAF88eNOgBCILHkK4SpCsho6GjAKYAnIcHo34fbYrGuJ0+YpW51uTQwzAHYDIhI0VHDiQ2NjVwAjWXQeAFcICF84km0AOiZWdk5ufgSxBMkskn9/IA= where treating `operator+` as `op_Addition` would cause `B.operator+` to be called instead of `A.op_Addition` without code change.

@tannergooding from my understanding it does not. That feature is completely orthogonal to this feature request. The new operator interfaces do not cover the scenario in the head post where...

@CyrusNajmabadi frankly, I don't remember by now what use case I originally had for this feature. A simple example I can come up with is implementing lisp-like tuples with `+`...

@kangaroo can you make a pull request?

You can now run a free (until the end of 2020) ARM64 instance on AWS: https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/new-t4g-instances-burstable-performance-powered-by-aws-graviton2/