loqs

@wangcan26 can you please test oneTBB support in the dev branch?

> @loqs please be advised we are still tying up the last bits here, and do not yet have our own CI testing in place for OneTBB. We will advise...

@gyx47 please try with ruby-slim 5.2.1-3 which removed ruby-pandoc-ruby from the test environment and instead ruby-kramdown is used which produces the expected output. Which would make this a packaging issue...

While pytest-lazy-fixtures is compatible with pytest 8, I encountered a scope issue after the switch with pytest 8`` ``` ==================================== ERRORS ==================================== ________ ERROR at setup of TestCache.test_save_bucket[in_memory_cache] _________ ScopeMismatch:...

Adding the requires removed from [lib/rack/handler/thin.rb](https://github.com/macournoyer/thin/commit/dbf793af9b98e31c65068aa5dbcc64b4c2ae7565#diff-435a0ad8ce19af2ded102f3ed5fd7862fa019aae6ffe84a868836c19f9a43be3) to [‎lib/thin/rackup/handler.rb](https://github.com/macournoyer/thin/commit/dbf793af9b98e31c65068aa5dbcc64b4c2ae7565#diff-17fee2e9f05d24fde96b5afc5848eedfdd9c9e515ef9c54efbb4b71917f32309) as below and sinatra passes the check: ```patch --- a/lib/thin/rackup/handler.rb +++ b/lib/thin/rackup/handler.rb @@ -1,5 +1,10 @@ # frozen_string_literal: true +require "thin" +require...

@ioquatix should `lib/thin/rackup/handler.rb` need any requires and if so is `lib/thin/rackup/handler.rb` the right location for them? I also noticed there does not seem to be any spec coverage of handler.rb?

@hpax is the same issue as [Possible regression in 2.42 termios refactoring re non-standard baud rate ](https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33340)? Do you have a suggested fix?

Could you use the C function [gnu_get_libc_version()](https://man.archlinux.org/man/gnu_get_libc_version.3.en) to determine the version at runtime? @thesamesam any suggestions?