Lloyd
Lloyd
> it might be helpful to port the above snippet into the rustdoc for Coproduct or CoproductTaker, with a mention that the trait bounds may need to be propagated upwards...
> The metaprogramming going on here is awesome, but it's Serious Black Magic to most folks using the library 😢 yeah, this is not good; I'm sorry to hear that...
Oh, this is a good idea. This is definitely a much better `combine_n`!
Since there's no conflict, I would prefer that we keep this PR to just implementing the fold methods for references. IMO, if the user is using the "wrong" folder "function"...
Hi there, Definitely, I think I like the idea of making it take `other` by value as well, for all the reasons that you listed (more general and more efficient)....
Ohh cool. That sounds promising :) looking forward to it! On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 4:08 Alexander Ronald Altman < [email protected]> wrote: > I think we can actually do...
It would definitely be nice to figure out a nice way to get enums working with `Generic` :) I think I attempted to do this before, but ran into snags...
> in turn allows us to reasonably add methods to the API where the type of the element at a given index is given by an associated type rather than...
Oh interesting indeed; that would make it easy to apply the same `Mapper` to different `Generic` impl'ing types :)
My only recommendation is that whatever solution is taken, that there be a reasonable default provided by this plugin that requires no additional configuration from the end user (e.g. add...