Lloyd

Thanks @dspyz-matician I think what you want makes sense and would make a good addition to the lib. Regarding introducing a new `into_generic_ref` or re-using the existing `into_generic` method; I...

> The problem arises when you want to apply constraints such as length. This fix addresses a limitation of compile-time constant generics, but doesn't fully leverage the type system. I...

++ I like the new direction (`typenum` as a feature, restoring "normal" value based len).

> 3\. "lie" about typenum stuff behind a non-default feature in published documentation, relying on `cargo` to warn "you need to activate the typenum feature to use this" I'm a...

Thanks @Ben-PH for your issue + the work you've put into this. I can certainly see that you have a use case for this. I'm currently on vacation, so please...

I'm almost certain that there is something that I'm missing :) > I'm more looking for: "You have a list of singletons. move those singletons into a struct to construct...

Thanks so much for taking the time and effort to put that together; I promise I'll read it and get back to you. Just a quick follow up question: In...

Sorry, taking another peek at this. I'll try to ask my question in a way that tries to utilise existing Frunk functions as a way to try to understand it...

Thanks @Ben-PH . I've given this some more thought, and my current feeling is that the exact solution you're after here is a tad niche for inclusion into frunk, which...

...first of all, I must say this is amazing and I can't think of a better way to do it (I might suggest SO for finding the optimal solution). However,...