llogiq
llogiq
Ok, since no one is stepping up, I say let's just merge this now and extend later. @bors r+
+1 from me. I usually dislike bright UI, especially at night. I use SimpleWhite regardless, though ;-)
That's easy, I basically used most of your API for my U8x16 type, so all it needs is a bit of search&replace. I don't have much time now, but perhaps...
All our tests fail anyway, so it wouldn't make a difference. However, benchmarking all compilation could be useful to macro authors as well, to help them check if their creations...
I think if `node` is final we need to `cat` the `final_output` of the node. So I replaced the loop with ``` for (i, &b) in input.iter().enumerate() { match node.find_input(b)...
There's still one error, because we prematurely cat the final output, but this "final" node may still be a prefix of another node that's valid. So with that corrected: ```...
Regarding the name, I think `scan` is short, but not too descriptive. Perhaps `find_longest_prefix`?
We deem false positives all instances of clippy reporting a problem where either there is none (and by this I mean objectively that the thing the lint should warn against...
I don't like the idea of spamming our issues. At best there would be _1_ issue called reported false positives and you could edit it to add links. Or it...