Maikel Llamaret Heredia
Maikel Llamaret Heredia
> Please, consider supporting [Flatpak](http://docs.flatpak.org/en/latest/introduction.html#reasons-to-use-flatpak) and publishing MystiQ on [Flathub](https://github.com/flathub/flathub/wiki/App-Submission). I am willing to package for all possible formats. I am personally not very aware of the procedure to package...
> Please, consider supporting [Flatpak](http://docs.flatpak.org/en/latest/introduction.html#reasons-to-use-flatpak) and publishing MystiQ on [Flathub](https://github.com/flathub/flathub/wiki/App-Submission). I am working in it
Can you make a Pull Request? stevenpusser wrote: >Ialreadypatchedthisintopresets.xmlfortheMXLinuxbuildbybasicallycopyingthesamepresetforMP4,anditworksatreattoshrinkvideosconsiderablywithoutlosingquality.ItsadvantageovertheMP4presetisthatitwillpreserveembeddedsubtitlestreamsinmkvinputvideos,whereconvertingtomp4formatlosesthem.Youarereceivingthisbecauseyouaresubscribedtothisthread.Replytothisemaildirectly,viewitonGitHub,orunsubscribe.[{"@context":"http://schema.org","@type":"EmailMessage","potentialAction":{"@type":"ViewAction","target":"https://github.com/swl-x/MystiQ/issues/114","url":"https://github.com/swl-x/MystiQ/issues/114","name":"ViewIssue"},"description":"ViewthisIssueonGitHub","publisher":{"@type":"Organization","name":"GitHub","url":"https://github.com"}}]
Operating System? Qt versión? Remember, mystiq only compiles with Qt >5.10
What you propose is interesting. Let's implement it. Thanks for using MystiQ Video Converter
> I would create professional codecs presets too (for DNxHD or ProRes, for instance) or edit friendly presets. Tell us about professional codecs presets (for DNxHD or ProRes, for instance),...
> Can you be more specific? What exactly do you want me to tell you? Don't worry, we already investigated about it. We will work on presets related to DNxHR...
> I think a good, easy way to implement this would be in a way similar to [QWinFF's presets](http://qwinff.github.io/qwinff-doc/html/presets.html#presets), though a built-in preset manger would be even better. I don't...
> Sorry if this is an unnecessary bump, but wouldn't it be a good idea to rename the title off this issue to "custom presets" from "cutom presets" (fixing the...