llCurious

Just follow the question above. Do you have any answers right now @Dawn-LX ? In addition, i have some new questions: - the quantization of activation is not consistent regards...

I checked this [blog](https://programmer.ink/think/testing-cifar10-data-set-with-alexnet-in-paddy.html) . Currently, (32+2*9-11)/4 = 9.75 and (33+2*9-11)/4 = 10. Therefore, the input shall be resizes to 33*33? I think for CIFAR-10 over ALexNet, the model architecture...

Yep, i have implemented the data loader for CIFAR-10 and ImageNet similar to MNIST. And you are right that the model architecture does not influence the MPC side efficiency. I...

Thank you for you responses. Do you mean the division protocol currently can only handle the case where the exponent of the divisor _b_ is the same? Or say, if...

OK，i got it. Sry for the late reply~ - I also notice that you in the Paper Section 5.6, you present the elemental data for the training performance with (or...

Hey, i am also working on this part. Could @AndesPooh258 init a PR or put the link to your github repo? Thanks a lot!!

Any updates? Could you @HuangPZ help point out the part of codes that you edit to get reasonable results for SecureML and Sarda? Below is the accuracy figure for MNIST+SecureML...

@HuangPZ Got it! It seems that the `getAccuracy` measures the accuracy of a trained model, instead of end-to-end secure training? Have you tried to train the model (i.e., SecureML) and...

Any updates? I also have the problem of passing `worker_init_fn`. I manage to remove the **kwargs and the duplicate keyword error is gone. However, the `worker_init_fn` does not seem to...

Thanks for your reply. The PR above indeed solves the duplicate keyword error.