Bjarte Johansen

I have been overwriting this again myself, but I recently changed to autoloading everything, and then I start getting problems with when things are happening and that the starter-kit bindings...

Do these rules make sense? This is not how I would use if-let/when-let or the let/if constructs. I think this should convert to something like ``` (let [?x ?y] (if...

You are probably right, but in the context of how the substitution works, these two rules are equivalent. The reason they are equivalent is that we do not know if...

@jonase, but the original would turn ``` (let [x (f y)] (if x (g e) (h f)) ``` into ``` (if-let [x (f y)] (g e) (h f)) ``` which...

Oh, wow. It is more than 2 years since I posted this. It seems like that is what I meant when I wrote it. Though, I am also talking about...

This hasn't been implemented. You might be able to jury-rig it with another window showing a copy of the current buffer. I will look into how to implement this at...

Thank you for contributing to jq-mode. I am not sure I understand what you are suggesting. > buffer narrowing as you type jq-interactively should already show the result of the...

That sounds like a nice feature! I am not entirely how that would be implemented in practice, but I am more than happy to accept a PR.

I have used `C-x h C-w`, i.e., `mark-whole-buffer -> kill-region`, but we could push it to a separate history variable that you can cycle through with a keybinding in a...

If you execute the command it will go into the `jq-interactive-history` variable. We could use that, we could even do something if you `C-g` and cheat something into the variable.