Luís Ferreira
Luís Ferreira
> See #5232 for context regarding `__xopCmp` and its dependence on low-level parameter order. Thanks, I will test with `__xopCmp` generated code, ~~although, https://github.com/dlang/dmd/pull/7561 got merged, which seems to supersede...
~~@MoonlightSentinel I guess `C++ interop tests` are linking with system `druntime`/`libphobos` instead of freshly compiled one. I can't reproduce this. Looking into the logs, `DFLAGS` are not setting `-L-rpath=`.~~ forget...
> Looks like you missed something. Sorry, my vim converted it to lowercase, somehow. Fixed.
> (Note: smart optimizers will generate a jump table for the if condition, but apparently ldc and dmd aren't one of them). Yes, but in this case its also ugly...
Added the labels to later tick off.
I don't know if this is acceptable without a DIP as it changes the grammar and adds new syntax? Feel free to add the DIP label, then. Aren't there other...
> The issue within mixin(C) is that you can already write mixin(C)(sea)(c) in the grammar today, inside an expression Yes. What I said is that can be passed through a...
Can you explain why this is being added? I can't see a reason for adding this as it can be done with normal code.
> Changed `__assert` to `__check` I already dumped my thoughts on using known keywords for reserved identifiers in C when `__import` got merged. `__` is reserved and we better have...
> @ljmf00 What is the basis of your assumption that this should be illegal? You are doing pointer arithmetic in @System code, it is not the job of the compiler...