Luís Ferreira
Luís Ferreira
> The more I think about this, the more I feel that a deprecation is a more suitable alternative. We added a new function attribute, people need to update their...
> Yes, definitely, if other attributes will be implemented then the same deprecation path must be taken. Ah, so you mean this? > - issue a deprecation whenever getFunctionAttributes is...
> > Ah, so you mean this? > > Yes. Ok, I can go with implementing it that way. I think this is the best way among the other options...
I agree with extending `with` to an expression. A library solution would be a workaround that is slower and can lead to more unclean code. If we have `with`, why...
@maxhaton you also forgot to add the new Expression node to `astbase.d`.
> @ljmf00 removing the union requires making my visitor much more complicated as I now have to walk everything myself versus just hooking where the identifiers appear I understand that,...
> @RazvanN7 see https://dlang.org/spec/function.html#return-scope-parameters paragraph 3. It's an indirect reference to a point that should be more explicit in the spec. There's nothing specific about constructors and how it behaves...
My opinion is that we should definitely move forward with a parametrized lexer. This is really useful to build a formatter and other tools on top of `libdmd`. I'm more...
This needs the issue number reference in the commit.
Some code, beyond my knowledge, is relying on reverse order. The added test runs successfully. I don't know what is happening.