livebe01
livebe01
Thanks for mentioning this @mikeboulet. From a skim of [related GitHub issues](https://github.com/usnistgov/ACVP-Server/issues?q=is%3Aissue%20health%20), there could be a correlation between high server load and status missing. Demo was working through a backlog...
The fix for this is on Demo in release [v1.1.0.41](https://github.com/usnistgov/ACVP-Server/releases/tag/v1.1.0.41).
As of 11/12/25, the fix for this is on Prod in release [v1.1.0.41](https://github.com/usnistgov/ACVP-Server/releases/tag/v1.1.0.41).
Thanks for mentioning this @cpu. `digestSize` is not meant to be a valid registration property, although it appears that the server is accepting values for it. We'll look into fixing...
The fix for this is on Demo in release [v1.1.0.41](https://github.com/usnistgov/ACVP-Server/releases/tag/v1.1.0.41).
As of 11/12/25, the fix for this is on Prod in release [v1.1.0.41](https://github.com/usnistgov/ACVP-Server/releases/tag/v1.1.0.41).
The fix for this is on Demo in release [v1.1.0.41](https://github.com/usnistgov/ACVP-Server/releases/tag/v1.1.0.41).
As of 11/12/25, the fix for this is on Prod in release [v1.1.0.41](https://github.com/usnistgov/ACVP-Server/releases/tag/v1.1.0.41).
Thanks for providing this @jvdsn. I'll take a look.
https://github.com/usnistgov/ACVP/blob/master/src/kas/sp800-56br2/sections/05-capabilities.adoc?plain=1#L241 states `IUTs *MUST* be capable of specifying how the FixedInfo is constructed for the KAS/KTS negotiation. Note that for the purposes of testing against the ACVP system, both uPartyInfo...