livebe01

@slontis, sorry, it looks like this ticket fell through the cracks. > There are test vectors in https://github.com/usnistgov/ACVP-Server/blob/master/gen-val/json-files/RSA-SigGen-FIPS186-5/internalProjection.json For the combination of hashAlg=SHAKE128 MGF=MGF1 > > The signature was only...

Joel, can you add a couple notes that TDES is no longer approved as of 1/1/24 w/ a reference to https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/SpecialPublications/NIST.SP.800-131Ar2.pdf? Add a note in section 5.1 and another below...

Strange. The value for `algorithm` in the registration.json files seems to be correct. It's just the other files. Thanks for mentioning this. We'll take a look. PS I was able...

Thanks @dspdon. The additional information is helpful and most probably related. As to `digestSize`, that's likely an artifact of how we're producing these sample files. It's automated. We can take...

Hi @dspdon, this issue has been fixed as part of the [v1.1.0.36](https://github.com/usnistgov/ACVP-Server/releases/tag/v1.1.0.36) release.

Hi @dspdon, thanks for mentioning this. It's certainly possible that a bug has been introduced into the SHAKE VOT tests. I wonder if others have been running into this as...

Thanks for doing that @dspdon. @jbrock24 is looking into this and will get back with you when he has more to share.

Hi @dspdon, thanks for sticking with us on this one. We think we've identified the issue. Can you try running the linked updated tests to confirm that we've resolved the...

> Do you believe your update to SHAKE will affect cSHAKE and KMAC validation results for the similar case of non-byte oriented outputs? The change we made shouldn't effect cSHAKE...

> Returning to the output bit alignment issue, I could use confirmation that your intent is to shift the least-significant bits of "partial bytes" into the most-significant bits of the...