liushuyu

I think this would be superseded by #7610

Yes but that's a story from the long past. However, with some time I should be able to pick up the knowledge that's needed to accomplish the job.

... and BTW, which branch I should target for? 2.0 or 2.1?

Hi, I am very sorry for the late response, I am not sure if I have 100% marked all the strings with `gettext` wrapper. And I will try to finish...

>@liushuyu no pressure. I am very thankfull for the hard work you all put into this project. I only want to give something back :) Thanks. And there's a hint...

Is this resolved?

**Do NOT** use for production usage. Currently very buggy and unusable. UI/UX issues should be reported to ~~Tantacrul~~ upstream developers.

The current code is a total mess, I know. The issue was I discovered some issues in the parser that sometimes parse the expressions incorrectly mid-implementation. So some duck-tape code...

Refactored macro expansion and extraction code

> I think overall this is a very cool PR! Thank you so much for working on this :) Would it be possible to add test-cases or is that not...