Tomáš Janoušek
Tomáš Janoušek
@TheKevJames Do we have some examples of situations where `github-actions` service name is needed? Most of the commits linked to this issue are switching back to `github`, and that is...
@andy-maier > Just in case the additional information helps: In our projects, the 422 error only shows up on Python 3.9 with latest package levels. Not on Python 3.9 with...
@nickmerwin Would you perhaps be able to shed some light on what's the difference between `github` and `github-actions` service names from the coveralls API point of view? The documentation (https://docs.coveralls.io/supported-ci-services...
@afinetooth Are you sure about `service_job_id` having to be non-null with `service_name` being `github`? My experience differs: we've been submitting runs with `service_name=github`, null `service_job_id` (as mentioned previously, GitHub doesn't...
@afinetooth I can check, yeah. Here for example: https://coveralls.io/builds/38506836, and there is no link, even though we're submitting with `service_name=github`.  And again, there **cannot** be any link, because GitHub...
Not just odd, using a token like COVERALLS_REPO_TOKEN (regardless of what env var it goes into) doesn't work in pull requests, as GitHub doesn't expose secrets in pull requests (for...
> @liskin I wasn't aware of that, though I see you mentioned it previously. Is that just a recommendation from Github? or with Github Actions simply not surface secrets in...
> * FWIW, the [Coveralls Github Action](https://github.com/coverallsapp/github-action) also sets a value for `service_job_id`, for which it uses `GITHUB_RUN_ID` per [this line](https://github.com/coverallsapp/github-action/blob/8cbef1dea373ebce56de0a14c68d6267baa10b44/src/run.ts#L48). Can we **please** stop suggesting that people put the...
Indeed, you understanding what the issue is, relaying it and vouching for it internally is the best possible outcome. So we're good! (Sorry for being very direct and possibly harsh....
> Indeed. It is especially so on the popup window. I'm currently using regular Vim, but IIRC, the rendering of the terminal buffer on Neovim was slightly better. Yeah, I'm...