lipchev
lipchev
Also, if we would be breaking things- please consider also #983
I think the approach that @dschuermans is using in the `ResultAnalysis1DInternalForces ` is the correct one- I'm also doing this for some of my classes- like when comparing two "measurements"...
On your first set of remarks: 1. Yes, presentation is one- value input is another point of interest: I imagine the input of the dimensions of a 3D object- there...
On the second point about representing other 'actual unit systems': I've had a look at BaseDimensions- and from what I can tell there is nothing that would break were it...
If you want I could make a PR of the first bit here: allowing the in-code registration of Default Units, as described in code snippets from the first post. This...
There is also #875 for you (all) to consider- it's not the most straightforward approach and I haven't thought it through a 100% - but that's why I put it...
And what about scientific notation? 
Not as far as I'm aware- I'm sticking with the versions from the first comment- I think those are the latest that work (not 100% sure). Also- based on the...
Duplicate of #376 (I am still using the old versions as per the mentioned issue)
If capitalizing the abbreviation means that "mL" would be the derived unit- then I vote for lowercase "l" (already the spellcheck is suggesting that I should be using "ml" instead)...