Lior Chen
Lior Chen
I thought of it, and eventually decided that it is not the RegExp's job to allow empty values: if a user defines a "number" regex, it should really check for...
Do you mean I can use a function as a custom rule? If so, then I guess it's possible but then I won't be able to use all the other...
I see what you mean, and I guess it is possible to create all those rules and the function you've suggested, but it seems a bit like code duplication: ```...
> maybe we can have one more config when defining it as RegExp I guess that would be a nice option too. what would happen to the shorthand regex form...
please update both the sources and create the dist and minified dist files using the build task and squash your commits. But I actually think the solution should be in...