Andrei Horak
Andrei Horak
Thank you both for your answers. It may be a pain to change this interface, but keep in mind developers also _feel_ pain and get confused by an inconsistent interface....
Thanks for your fast answer! Curious to see how this will develop.
@ace-subido Marking the whole workflow as failed may be too harsh; @pokonski Indeed, it's not really clear from the DSL 😊
I don't really see any value in this `job.skip!`. If I want to "skip" the current job and go to the next one, I can simply `return`. My initial question...
Indeed, I've spotted a bug on that part. I wanted to [flush related caches](https://github.com/linkyndy/remodel/blob/master/remodel/models.py#L89), but unfortunately I am also wiping existing descriptors defined on the field handler itself. I'll start...
Actually, after more thinking on this, I am inclined to say that the current behaviour is the intended one. Let me explain. In the above example, we are operating on...
This is the approach I've followed, but would still like to see a better, "official" way to do it. I believe it would be useful for many!
I don't believe that error is raised because there are symbols used in the hash. But I didn't dig into it, so you may be right. One easy fix is...
Same issue here, only that **every** requests times out or takes >20s to respond. Basically, we cannot use the API. And we haven't heard back on any of our tickets...
@jeremyephron, what is the status of this repo? I see a lot of PRs pending for quite some time now. I also found a few missing things and would like...