Steven Giesel

@nulltoken Good job! I am fine as long as this version still works: ```csharp public NCronJobOptionBuilder AddJob( Delegate jobDelegate, string cronExpression, ``` I think the docs should showcase both and...

That is fair if we keep both of them. I would be not onboard to drop the "string cron" version given that we want to give users the easiest setup...

> @linkdotnet Can we at least deprecate > > ``` > AddJob( > Delegate jobDelegate, > string cronExpression, > TimeZoneInfo? timeZoneInfo = null, > string? jobName = null) > ```...

Hey hey @nulltoken - sure I did have some time but also totally forgot about that :D I am still not a fan of forcing users to supply a `jobName`....

> Does it support connecting to MySQL 9.0 You asked this in 3 separate tickets. I don't want to be rude, but at least just try it out and try...

Hey @samtrion Besides that we don’t offer templates for TUnit - is there anything missing or not working? It should work without any problem (didn’t try it until now).

We can add the template. And probably we will do this only for `v2` of Bunit. The whole `TestContext` name conflict will be a thing of the past as we...

We have to check how nice **TUnit** plays together with our templates, given that we use `Microsoft.NET.Sdk.Razor.` So there are multiple (custom) source code generators at work.

Did you use the "classic" C# tests or tests written in razor files?

Short test from my side: ```no-class warning CS8892: Method 'TestingPlatformEntryPoint.Main(string[])' will not be used as an entry point because a synchronous entry point 'AutoGeneratedProgram.Main(string[])' was found. ``` Seems there is...