Linas Vepštas

Huh. So the proposal is that there are some "special" words, such as ``, which cause a C function to be called, and that C function takes ... `foo`, the...

Ah! OK, yes, very good. Right, the a-priori, use-the-first-one-found approach is not sufficient. Yes, for any given input, we should try all three -- spell-guessing, regex, and standard lookup. The...

I just unearthed this in my email box. I'll try tomorrow; keep reminding me.

I read through this, and see no easy solution. I want to put this on the back burner for another few months or more. * For Shel Silverstein, we could...

The following directories would make sense, to me: ``` tests/python tests/link-parser tests/api ``` where `tests/api` would hold the existing C++ tests.

The "(You) go home" variant is particularly important, as it provides a subject for directives/imperatives. See https://github.com/opencog/relex/issues/231

One way to implement this would be with certain special link types. For example: ``` +---Wi--+-MVp-+ | | | LEFT-WALL go.v home.r ``` The `Wi` link could be interpreted as...

One possible solution is to perform a one-point compactification. The dictionary contains the phantom words, and thier connectors. Ordinary disjuncts can link to these, but should do so using a...

Issue #1234 describes a special case.

There seem to be several plausible solutions (including inserting words during tokenization). I don't know which is best or easiest. Let's explore each in greater detail. So, this https://github.com/opencog/link-grammar/issues/224#issuecomment-247056611 is...