Akase Haruka
Akase Haruka
> i got this error on my pc when batch_size was auto. i set it to 4 and it's gone yes, for me it's 8. confirmed causing by "auto"
same Diagnostics ID E77851FC-5200-44B9-B191-A7E20928570D/20240220025350
Good if can have migrations
How is it going? Is there any working on progress?
> I remember that's a never triggered bug in geth after EIP150. If you set a very large gasLimit, it's still possible to reach it. > in execution spec, the...
I understand your point, but I still think it's not a good idea to have zk circuits behave differently than geth in such an unlikely scenario. Even if it's almost...
> Since geth starts at 1, I would say it's valid that it can reach 1025, because it has an offset of +1 from the yellow paper definition of depth!...
Yes, I noticed this too. Current bench method cannot seperate "setup" and "bench" code. I'm not sure how to migrate the macro part like `full_bench_impl` to criterion.
mannually build and use devlibs can resolve this, don't know how to correct jitpack
you need to re-organize it as ``` App::new() .wrap_api() .with_json_spec_at("/api/spec/v2") .with_swagger_ui_at("/-/docs") .service(web::resource("/-/liveness").route(web::post().to(echo_pet))) .service( web::scope("/-").service(web::resource("/metrics").route(web::post().to(echo_pet))), ) .build() ``` the scope router will swallow all traffic and return 404 if there's no...