Serge Matveenko comments

Results 92 comments of


                                            Serge Matveenko

List field

It seems like it this was about one 502d983 commit not all four that shown on this pull request. Am I right?

List field

@caitifbrito could you please squash the correct commits into single one and rebase it on actual `master` branch. Thank you very much! Also it will be great to have tests...

Add unique validation.

@collinanderson could you please provide exact steps to reproduce this problem

Feature: multilevel progressbar

@paulo-raca it looks like something that solves it and even looks gorgeous. Thanks for your work!

Feature: multilevel progressbar

@WoLpH I'm happy with #208. Feel free to close this one if it looks redundant to you now.

fields.Method result should be able to be wrapped into other field types

@sloria I think the main problem here that the field's schema and the data being returned on serialization are mixed up. So, thinking from the architectural point of view first...

fields.Method result should be able to be wrapped into other field types

@lafrech It would be great!

fields.Method result should be able to be wrapped into other field types

@lafrech I believe, this issue is exactly about this

"IndexError: list index out of range" when accessing ignore_lists or freeze_factories from thread

Any workaround for this? It really hurts.

How about parametrizing fixtures instead? Maybe, utilizing `case` syntax. Something like ```rust #[fixture(foo, case("a"), case("b"))] fn fx(foo: &str) -> String { String::from(foo) } #[rstest] fn my_test(fx: String) {} ``` Which...