Lieuwe Rooijakkers

Well sure, that's basically what I use for myself. Definitely not the nicest for nontechnical recipients, but not the worst.

Thank you! I can take a look at something like webloop, like you propose. But indeed I'm afraid it is too basic to be able to handle WhatsApp web. I'm...

Hmm yeah for now the internal API seems to be pretty stable, but of course they change that approach if third party clients are becoming too popular. If you're interested...

This sounds really nice as an addition for sure, if you can build it in a not-too-messy way I will merge it for sure, I don't see any downsides(?) I'm...

Well, FWIW, the QR code is just a file on disk and shared using the fileserver as long as the qr code hasn't been scanned yet.

After 9b6cb52345e06aa2e3e51b06155ac5f9f7f48871 this might work, if somebody could confirm that would be nice.

@poVoq it would definitely take a higher server load (probably linear with respect to the amount of users), but to my knowledge nobody has yet tried it.

IIRC @XP-fan tried it for private messages but there was something that was a problem, but I'm not sure where the problem was. So if you managed to set it...

Same issue here ``` $ timetrap cannot load such file -- timetrap: ["/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/2.3.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in `require'", "/usr/local/lib/ruby/site_ruby/2.3.0/rubygems/core_ext/kernel_require.rb:55:in `require'", "/usr/local/lib/ruby/gems/2.3.0/gems/timetrap-1.10.0/bin/timetrap:3:in `'", "/usr/local/bin/timetrap:22:in `load'", "/usr/local/bin/timetrap:22:in `'"] $ ruby --version ruby 2.3.0p0 (2015-12-25 revision 53290)...

I mean, if it's possible to use the site from a browser (just using javascript) it shouldn't be too hard to get the API key one way or another, right?