Lara Ianov

Agreed that this would be a nice feature to have although understandably a potentially difficult one to support for nuclei data. Any updates on whether there will be support of...

Indeed, I would love to see this module for multiple samples. We just tried to add it to our ongoing development of nf-core/scnanoseq and encountered this same issue. Thanks for...

@ewels : any idea if this is something that may be fixed in the near future? We would love to have this feature for the MultiQC report from nf-core/scnanoseq. But...

Agreed, we are also seeing this with the latest version / v3.4.1 (same approach for single-cell data with the use of `--read_group`). Before (version 3.3.1) the same sample used ~194...

@andrewprzh : in my case it was set as part of the NextFlow job from our `nf-core/scnanoseq` pipeline. Upon checking the nextflow logs, it reported much higher usage without causing...

@andrewprzh : thank you for your work on this once again. Do you foresee a fix on this issue in the near future? We are getting close to final review...

@andrewprzh : No problem, totally get it and thank you for the quick reply. We will move forward with this plan in the meantime.

@andrewprzh : thank you for the update. @atrull314 and I will be looking into this new release for sure for performance in single-cell data. Thank you for your continued updates...

@andrewprzh : Great, we will be trying this out asap. Thank you again for your updates.

@andrewprzh : just to follow-up on our end. We are also seeing improvements in memory with this latest version after some pre-lim tests (~80GB with a PromethION dataset). We will...