梁海 Liang Hai

https://lianghai.dev

Multilingual font technologist, @typotheque The Hague, Netherlands Helping Unicode–OpenType developers and users understand complex scripts like Indic ones and Mongolian.

Results 15 issues of


                                            梁海 Liang Hai

A new project name?

11

comment

Certainly not a critical issue for now, but, just saying, with this current name, “OpenType shaping documents”, it’s pretty awkward to refer to this project, because it sounds quite official...

tracking

Terminology

Potencial terminology improvements: - [ ] `Mark` → `First_Syllable` - [ ] `Onset` → `Syllable_Initial` * “Onset” is currently the only term from the terminology onset/nucleus/coda. - [ ] `Devsger`...

Add phonetic letter’s ASCII transcriptions to the UTN document

According to the [data file](https://github.com/lianghai/mongolian/blob/refactoring/utn-data/characters.yaml).

Table restructuring

- [ ] Table 4, Written units: move “Sub–written-unit variants” columns to the right side (following the “Represented phonetic letters” columns).

Update UTN to pick up the changes made in the branch Chachlag_Onset

g.Gh.fina from lookup III.n_j_y_w_h_g.chachlag_onset is accidentally overridden by lookup III.h_g.onset_and_devsger_and_gender.A

1

comment

Test cases: - ᠠᠭ᠎ᠠ - ᠠᠨ᠎ᠠ

Masculine signal glyph for -ig isn’t cleaned up after a stray g.medi

Test case: ᠠᠩᠭᠯᠢ

@*.for_condition classes don’t seem to be necessary

https://github.com/lianghai/mongolian/blob/6852f8991cb2f5f1e8c531cebf0443e110d0cb45/font-tooling/otl/stateless/lookups-conditions.fea#L2-L7

Wrong documentation for GSComponent.smartComponentValues

https://github.com/schriftgestalt/GlyphsSDK/blob/441d889b855374f323e627c62cc7ca82643fa351/ObjectWrapper/GlyphsApp/__init__.py#L7015-L7031 It appears to require axis IDs instead of names as keys. Lines 7015, 7025, and 7026 need to be corrected.

ff.buildBinaryFeatures() somehow affects language systems in exported FEA

Build the same ff, apply one of them to a certain font using .buildBinaryFeatures(), then somehow the results of .asFea() aren’t the same anymore. Is this an intended behavior? Can...

1
2
›