Maik Riechert

I'm temporarily taking care of the CI runners for lightgbm in Microsoft (one Azure DevOps CPU pool (8-core), one GitHub Actions GPU runner (V100)). I agree that the project should...

> [@letmaik](https://github.com/letmaik) **was our Azure DevOps pool removed????** > > I just saw the following on CI for [#6979](https://github.com/microsoft/LightGBM/pull/6979) ([Azure DevOps build link](https://dev.azure.com/lightgbm-ci/lightgbm-ci/_build/results?buildId=17876&view=results)). > > > There was a resource...

@jameslamb Done. Jobs are running on https://github.com/microsoft/LightGBM/pull/6979 now.

@jameslamb Once your PR is merged I'd suggest going to the broken PRs and just pressing "Update Branch" so they pick up the new name.

Question 1: See https://lensfun.github.io/calibration/ for the process of contributing new lens profiles. All profiles are community contributed as far as I know. Question 2: Sounds like a good idea in...

@ribtoks It would be helpful if you could test this locally and submit a new PR given that the original author isn't responsive.

That should be possible, care to submit a PR? You can get inspiration from here: https://github.com/letmaik/rawpy/blob/d368d56f2eb9e7bd1f4c2f783bc4873d177e321b/.github/workflows/ci.yml#L73

@marty-sullivan Do you want to take this on? Shouldn't be much effort.

After some searching through GitHub I found out that this action relies on a special [undocumented token](https://github.com/actions/toolkit/blob/e9c6ee99a59ec34586d4374b68efe5cabfcee9db/packages/artifact/src/internal/config-variables.ts#L34) that is made available to actions as environment variable and is unrelated to...